Reference: Bulletin 2025-50
{
“title”: “OCC Proposes Preemption of State Interest-on-Escrow Laws”,
“slug”: “occ-guidance-preemption-state-interest-escrow-laws-bulletin-2025-50”,
“excerpt”: “The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency proposes to preclude state laws that restrict federal banks from paying interest on escrow accounts or assessing related fees. Read the full regulatory update.”,
“content_html”: “
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) regarding the preemption of state interest-on-escrow laws. This bulletin signals a significant potential shift in how OCC-regulated banks manage real estate escrows, focusing on the federal authority to override state restrictions. The proposal aims to clarify the extent of federal preemption over state laws that might limit interest payments on escrows or the fees banks can charge for escrow services. By reviewing this notice, you can understand the scope of the proposal, the implications for your institution, and the procedural steps required to provide public comments during the 30-day comment period. The following analysis provides a comprehensive breakdown of the proposal, its legal basis, and the practical actions required from compliance teams and legal departments of OCC-regulated banks.
nn
Executive Summary
n
- n
- What Regulator Issued: The OCC issued an NPRM on December 23, 2025, proposing to preclude state laws that prevent federal banks from paying interest on escrows.
- Who Is Impacted: This rulemaking affects state-chartered banks under the OCCu2019s primary supervision that conduct real estate escrow activities.
- Key Dates: The notice is effective immediately, but public comments are due within 30 days of publication, by January 22, 2026.
- Action Required: Review current compliance policies regarding escrow interest, fees, and preemption determinations. Prepare a formal response to the OCCu2019s inquiry.
- Implications: If finalized, banks may gain flexibility in pricing escrow services and compensating funds for interest-bearing accounts, potentially streamlining operations for large-scale real estate portfolios.
n
n
n
n
n
nn
What the Regulator Issued
n
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency published this notice in the Federal Register on December 23, 2025. The document explicitly seeks comments on whether current federal law should preempt state laws that restrict interest payments on escrows held for real estate properties. The notice references existing federal banking statutes, which generally grant the OCC broad authority over national banks and federal savings associations. Under current interpretations, many states retain the power to regulate escrow accounts, but this proposal questions the uniformity required by federal banking law in the context of interest payments.
nn
The proposal outlines that state laws limiting interest payments on escrows may conflict with federal mandates. It also proposes a standard definition of u201cescrow accountu201d to ensure consistency across jurisdictions. The regulatory text notes that state laws requiring banks to pay a flat fee for escrow services or to restrict interest to a low percentage may be preempted if they hinder a national banku2019s ability to operate effectively. The notice provides a direct link to the full Federal Register publication, where the complete text of the proposed rule is available for public review.
nn
Furthermore, the notice addresses the procedural aspect of rulemaking. It states that the OCC is opening a public comment period for 30 days. During this window, financial institutions, consumer advocates, and industry groups can submit written comments. The notice also invites stakeholders to participate in a webinar or roundtable, if available, to discuss the nuances of the proposal. The OCC emphasizes that its primary goal is to eliminate regulatory uncertainty for national banks while ensuring that consumers are not negatively affected by the removal of state restrictions.
nn
Who Is Impacted
n
This rulemaking applies primarily to state-chartered banks that are subject to the OCCu2019s primary supervision. This category includes national banks and federal savings associations, as well as state-chartered banks that have opted into federal supervision. Institutions that hold escrow accounts for real estate loans, such as construction loans or bridge mortgages, will be directly impacted. The proposal does not apply to thrifts or credit unions unless they fall under the OCCu2019s jurisdiction through specific chartering agreements.
nn
The impact extends to legal departments and compliance teams within these banks. These teams must evaluate whether their current policies align with the proposed federal standard. For banks that currently limit interest payments to comply with state laws, this proposal would necessitate a significant policy revision. Additionally, banks that have standardized fees across jurisdictions may find that their current fee structures would need to be adjusted if the OCC adopts the proposed preemption framework. The notice does not affect banks that do not hold real estate escrows or those that are primarily depository institutions without escrow activities. However, many banks hold a mix of accounts, so a comprehensive review is necessary.
nn
Key Dates
n
The OCC published the notice of proposed rulemaking on December 23, 2025. The public comment period is set for 30 days following the publication date. Consequently, the deadline for submitting comments is January 22, 2026. The notice states that comments must be submitted via the Federal Register or through the OCCu2019s official website. The OCC may extend the comment period if it determines that more time is needed to gather comprehensive input. It is crucial to note that the final rulemaking schedule has not been confirmed. If the OCC issues a final rule, it may become effective on a date specified in the final document. Until then, banks should operate under existing state and federal laws but be prepared for a potential change in the regulatory landscape.
nn
The notice also references potential future dates for the release of the final rule. If the OCC proceeds with finalization, it would typically follow the administrative rulemaking process, which includes a period of public notice and final review. This process usually takes several months after the comment period closes. Banks should plan their compliance calendars accordingly, anticipating a potential rule change in the spring of 2026 if the proposal is adopted. It is also important to monitor the OCCu2019s website for updates on the status of the NPRM.
nn
Practical Action Checklist
n
- n
- Review Escrow Policies: Examine current policies for paying interest on escrow accounts. Determine if these policies are driven by state law or OCC guidance.
- Assess State Law Compliance: Identify any state laws that currently restrict interest payments or fees. Document these restrictions to prepare for potential preemption.
- Prepare Comments: Draft a formal response to the OCCu2019s inquiry. This should outline your institutionu2019s stance on the proposal and provide evidence of the regulatory burden imposed by state laws.
- Coordinate with Legal: Ensure legal counsel reviews the proposalu2019s legal basis for preemption. Prepare arguments based on federal banking statutes and administrative law.
- Monitor Webinars: Register for any OCC-sponsored webinars or roundtables. Use these opportunities to voice concerns and learn from other institutions.
- Update Fee Schedules: Evaluate current fee schedules for escrow services. Prepare to adjust fees if the proposed rule allows for market-based pricing.
n
n
n
n
n
n
nn
Open Questions
n
The proposal leaves several critical questions unanswered. Specifically, it does not specify the exact criteria for determining if a state law is preempted. Banks may need to consult legal counsel to interpret the proposed standards. The proposal also does not clarify how interest rates will be calculated if the rule becomes effective. Banks will need to determine whether interest will be compounded or simple, and if there are caps on the interest rates.
nn
Another uncertainty is the impact on consumer protection. The OCC states that the proposal aims to protect consumers, but critics may argue that removing state restrictions could lead to predatory lending practices. Banks should be prepared to address these concerns in their comments. The proposal also does not address how state laws regarding escrow disclosure will be handled. If the OCC preempts interest restrictions, it may also preempts disclosure requirements. Banks must decide if they will continue to follow state disclosure laws or wait for federal guidance.
nn
Furthermore, the notice does not specify how the OCC will handle state laws that are less restrictive than federal law. This raises the question of whether the OCC will preempt state laws that are more protective of consumers than the proposed federal standard. The proposal also does not clarify the role of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) in this process. Banks should monitor whether the CFPB issues guidance that interacts with the OCCu2019s rulemaking.
nn
In summary, the OCCu2019s proposal to preempt state interest-on-escrow laws is a significant regulatory development for federal banks. This bulletin provides a detailed analysis of the proposal, its implications, and the actions required. Compliance teams and legal departments must review their current policies and prepare for potential changes in the regulatory landscape. By staying informed and actively participating in the rulemaking process, financial institutions can ensure they are well-positioned to navigate the evolving regulatory environment for real estate escrows.
“,
“action_list”: [
“Review current escrow interest policies for alignment with proposed federal standards.”,
“Identify all state laws restricting interest payments or fees.”,
“Draft a formal comment letter to submit within the 30-day public comment period.”,
“Consult legal counsel on the legal basis for preemption arguments.”,
“Register for any OCC webinars regarding the proposed rulemaking.”,
“Prepare to adjust fee schedules if the final rule allows market-based pricing.”
],
